Veiling at the Latin Mass


There are several things that grab your attention the first few times you attend the Traditional Latin Mass. Some immediately notice the positioning of the crucifix, candles and altar cards which are situated for the Mass to be offered ad orientem. If it is a Low Mass, the greater emphasis on silence can be quite striking. For most, however, the sheer sight of so many women veiling at the Mass presents a visual rarely seen these days in the “typical” Catholic parish.

So what’s the deal with all the veils?

Most are aware, to some degree at least, that women historically covered their heads in Church. Many have read St. Paul’s instruction from his first letter to the Corinthians:

“I commend you because you remember me in everything and maintain the traditions even as I have delivered them to you. But I want you to understand that the head of every man is Christ, the head of a woman is her husband, and the head of Christ is God. Any man who prays or prophesies with his head covered dishonors his head, but any woman who prays or prophesies with her head unveiled dishonors her head—it is the same as if her head were shaven. For if a woman will not veil herself, then she should cut off her hair; but if it is disgraceful for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her wear a veil. For a man ought not to cover his head, since he is the image and glory of God; but woman is the glory of man.”
(1 Corinthians 11:2-7).

While the traditional practice was there from the beginning, it was not canonically addressed by the Church until the issuance of the 1917 Code of Canon Law. Canon 1262 stated in part:

“Men, in a church or outside a church, while they are assisting at sacred rites, shall be bare-headed, unless the approved mores of the people or peculiar circumstances of things determine otherwise; women, however, shall have a covered head and be modestly dressed, especially when they approach the table of the Lord.”

This of course defines the practice of veiling (or to be more precise covering ones head) as one of obedience and not simply personal devotion.

However, the 1983 Code of Canon Law did not reissue canon 1262. In fact, canon 6 of the revised code abrogated it, in addition to any other canon of the 1917 Code that was not specifically included in the new legislation.

What then is driving the rediscovery of such a beautiful tradition among so many women, particularly younger women? More specific to this discussion: why are so many women who choose to attend the Traditional Latin Mass also deciding to veil?

The answer is simple and twofold.

First, presented with so many others veiling at Mass, women begin to feel a pull toward the practice. I have personally heard of many such examples. At times, the primary reason women have waited so long to begin veiling is simply due to the fear of others reactions to them. It is not because they do not want to veil. Entering into an environment where most women cover their heads at Mass, these women finally make the intellectual decision to respond to the spiritual calling to cover. It is as much a response of their heart to God’s calling as it is something they themselves have chosen.

Secondly, they are responding in obedience to the expectation of Holy Mother Church. The juridical explanation was given by Raymond Cardinal Burke, the prefect for the Apostolic Signatura in Rome, back in 2011 when he wrote:

“The wearing of a chapel veil for women is not required when women assist at the Holy Mass according to the Ordinary Form of the Roman Rite. It is, however, the expectation that women who assist at the Mass according to the Extraordinary Form cover their heads, as was the practice at the time that the 1962 Missale Romanum was in force. It is not, however a sin to participate in the Holy Mass according to the Extraordinary Form without a veil.”

If for no other reason than obedience, attendance at the Traditional Latin Mass allows for women to veil -often for the first time ever- in the presence of the tabernacle and Our Eucharistic Lord. An increasingly greater availability to the Traditional Mass (the Extraordinary Form of the Roman Rite) in the years since Summorum Pontificum is facilitating the reemergence of this beautiful practice. While there is no sin in NOT veiling at the Traditional Mass, refusing to do so is a conscious decision to oppose the expectation of the Church…at least once one is aware of the practice at the time of the 1962 Missal, the 1917 Code of Canon Law in force then and, finally, the recent statement from Cardinal Burke.

Please take a moment and watch the below video by the Catholic News Service regarding the reemergence of this beautiful practice. While the video begins by incorrectly stating that veiling ended because of Vatican II, it stills presents a good overall explanation of the theology behind veiling. Of course, the arguments put forth are applicable to all forms and rites of the Catholic Mass, and are not exclusive to the Extraordinary Form alone.

(Photo by Rob Schumacher, The Arizona Republic)

Posted on September 27, 2014, in liturgy and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 21 Comments.

  1. I do not veil, of course, but you mentioning the SILENCE at a Low Mass was one of my first observations as well at my first time. It started the ball rolling for what eventually led us to go 99% TLM all the time.

    • Thanks for your comment Marc. There is so much noise in our culture today that silence within the Mass provides us the rare time each week to actually listen attentively to God. Having said that, I greatly appreciate chant and polyphony within the Mass as well.

      • Definitely! The high Mass is our usual Sunday option, but as a friend calls it, the noble simplicity of the low Mass definitely has the setting for the silent escape.

  2. Except for the fact that veiling for so many of us veil because we have an emotional and loving connection to Mary, AND so many of us go to the Novus Ordo Mass who wear a veil…. I like the post.

  3. Well said, sir. Thanks be to God. You have provided an excellent snapshot of the movement of the Holy Spirit among the faithful.

  4. I went to my first Latin Mass Sunday and absolutely fell in love with it. I bought a mantilla beforehand and wore it. I had no idea, really, what to expect from veiling or the Mass itself. I was blown away at how powerful the silence was. This may sound strange, but I was also surprised at the calm that came from wearing my mantilla. It truly helped me focus on prayer and to not be distracted. It was the most beautiful experience I’ve had at a Mass yet.

  5. I’m in my late 40’s, uh-hem, so let me ask, when did veiling end at the Ordinary Form masses? It’s not as if I grew up veiling until the 1983 Code of Canon Law put a stop to it. I’ve only ever veiled at TLM.

    • The code of Canon law of 1983 did not put a stop to veiling.
      If you read the actual code it just says you have an option to veil or not.
      BTW, I veil at the Novus Ordo.

    • It mostly ended in 1969ish if not a little prior.. or after. (This depends on the Region, how ardent they were in abiding in Scripture there, and many other factors.)

      (Studying the issues of our times, esp. when regarding the Holy Faith.. makes this clearer.)

  6. I’m in my mid-50’s; wore veils as a child. Stopped in the early 1970’s. One thing to realize is that most women did not wear veils to church in the 1950’s–they wore hats–the same hats they wore shopping, or out to lunch, or just about anywhere else. My mom attended a Catholic women’s college in 1949 and they were not allowed off campus without hat and gloves. If you look at pictures of church congregations from that era, women wore hats more than veils. Veils became popular when hats went out, for one thing they didn’t muss the hair.

  7. I could be wrong, but it sure seems like a lot of women in the past simply didnt understand the sacred reasoning behind wearing the veil. I know for me the first thing that comes to mind when I see a women wearing a veil is “Wow, that lady has a strong understanding of what is going on during Mass!”

    If women stopped wearing the veil when it became optional, then that seems to be a red-flag that they weren’t catechized, or didnt care, and were all of a sudden “free” from the “old ways.”

    If authentic masculinity and femininity were to resurface within Catholicism, would that be a bad thing? If men sought out selflessness and women understood their sacred holiness, would we not be heading in the right direction?

    • I would like to know the sacred reasoning behind wearing the veil.

      This article references Fr. Joseph Fitzmyer, SJ, whom I heard speak on several passages in 1 Cor,, including chapter 11.

      Fr. Fitzmyer said the best sense of Paul’s phrase “because of the angels” in 1 Cor. 11:10 indicates that angels are present at sacred gatherings and every precaution should be taken to avoid offending them. Therefore, defective persons (as defined unfit for Levitical priesthood per Lev. 21:17-23) would require camouflage, a head covering.

  8. Cinda Rinaldi

    I wear a veil, always at Mass, even the NO. Sometimes I am the only one. It is sad that more women do not see the beauty of the veil. All sacred things are veiled.

  9. What’s your opinion about veiling at Novus Ordo?
    I started to think about veiling when I first attended the TLM, and when I decided to wear a veil I didn’t see the point of wearing it only at TLM. Especially because there is no Extraordinary Form of the Mass being held regularly in my town, just occasionally. As I didn’t decide to veil because of the people, but because of Christ’s presence and respecting the tradition, it seemed logical to veil at Novus Ordo as well. My reason and motive for attending both forms are equal and that’s Christ.
    Since I started to veil, I didn’t see any article about veiling at Novus Ordo, and that’s why I’m asking for your opinion.
    Regards and God bless

    • I think you are on the right track. I was catechized about five years ago by a priest about the benefits and inappropriateness of veiling before the Blessed Sacrament. I also vail at Novus Ordo Masses, Extraordinary form Masses, during Eucharistic adoration, and Eucharistic processions. In other words, if our Lord is present, then I veil. Another component of the 1917 Canon Law that should have remained is that women dress modestly. A resurgence of that should occur. No bare shoulders or knees showing– out of respect for our Lord, the priests, and ourselves.

      • I am completely the same, I veil where Christ is present. I felt it would be wrong of me to veil at an EF mass but not at a NO/Adoration etc, it’s the same Christ, so why would I veil for one and not the others. I’m one of a handful at my NO parish who veil, and the only one who veils during the 11am Sunday mass (the other veil-ers go to different times).

      • Thank you Janine and Emily for encouraging. ❤

  10. Why did veiling end? It may not have specifically ended by dictum of Vatican II but I think you will agree that overall it did end because of it.

  11. I’ve ALWAYS honored God (and dress modestly). I don’t need a veil to show it. God knows my heart.

  1. Pingback: Sv. Ivan Pavao II. — Svjedočanstva & Vjera – Site Title

  2. Pingback: Ein Kommentar zum Frau sein – Annabelle Schreibt

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: